Policy proposal for compatibility packages
pertusus at free.fr
Thu Jan 3 15:11:46 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:47:57AM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:42:35 +0100
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
> > Why not let the packagers decide for themselves? Packagers should
> > decide on their own how the spend their time best. This should not be
> > in the scope of FESCO.
> > I can't really see how compat-packages could be a threat to Fedoras
> > release cycles.
> > Not trusting packagers is a threat for fedora.
> When those compat packages start failing to rebuild, that slows us
Hopefully there are procedures to avoid being slowed down by packages
that don't rebuild. I don't think that compat packages are th emain
packages not rebuilding, unmaintained packages are.
> When too many of our packages rely on those compat packages,
That is another issue. I am all for policy that discourages shipping
packages in fedora that use compat packages.
> that slows us down. When the package maintainer for the non-compat
> package gets bogged down with bug reports and requests for assistance
> with the -compat package problems that slows us down.
That is a real issue, however the compat package maintainer should take
care of those bugs and the primary maintainer can, like anyone else
and like any other review object to the review.
More information about the devel