Fedora too cutting edge?

Jarod Wilson jwilson at redhat.com
Thu Jan 10 21:17:20 UTC 2008

Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Ship it with a way to revert to previous behavior. If people post
>> bugzilla items and revert, you know it didn't work and you will still
>> have someone to test your next experiment.
> Like jima said... I'm guessing most people simply won't bother with the bug
> report. Or ever test the new stack again for the life of the release. (Note
> that the latest F8 kernel has dv capture support for OHCI 1.0 controllers,
> while the initial release kernel does not).
>>>> Agreed... At least firewire has been broken for too long (IMHO)
>> I gave up on it somewhere around FC3 and switched to the CentOSplus
>> kernel where I needed something that mostly worked.  So I'm not a good
>> tester any more.
> Uhm... So you gave up on juju three releases before it existed? It didn't show
> up until F7...

Wow. I can't count. Make that four releases.

Okay, anyhow, enough of this, as Hans said, we're working on fixing things. In
the mean time, multiple 3rd-party repositories package up the old stack for
those who still need it.

/me goes back to attempting to be productive...

Jarod Wilson
jwilson at redhat.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080110/6c0463be/attachment-0002.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list