long term support release

[Jos Vos]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:48:16PM +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:

> Well, I actually use Fedora in a strong production environment (power 
> control office). The current policy (the EOL of F<n> is one month after 
> the F<n+2>) provides me one year LTS (assuming the release is per 
> half-year). Thus I just skip one release, i.e. FC1-->FC3-->FC5-->F7 .
> 
> One-year LTS is an acceptable compromise for me. But ideally, from the 
> "production" point of view, I would prefer 9-month cycle (and hence 
> 1.5year LTS) ...

Wondering what the difference with using RHEL/CentOS + EPEL is then...

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos at xos.nl>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204