long term support release

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 13:35:37 UTC 2008


Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> 
>> Actually, I assume most people being in real need for a RHL replacement
>> have quit Fedora long time ago.
> 
> Well, I'm still here and Fedora fills my needs better than RHL ever did.
> 
> Emmanuel "4.2 was nice, though" Seyman

If you would be happy with a still-supported FC6, is there any reason 
you couldn't run CentOS 5.1 and be equally happy for several more years?

As far as I can tell they are close enough...  What's missing for you?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com




More information about the devel mailing list