long term support release
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 13:35:37 UTC 2008
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>
>> Actually, I assume most people being in real need for a RHL replacement
>> have quit Fedora long time ago.
>
> Well, I'm still here and Fedora fills my needs better than RHL ever did.
>
> Emmanuel "4.2 was nice, though" Seyman
If you would be happy with a still-supported FC6, is there any reason
you couldn't run CentOS 5.1 and be equally happy for several more years?
As far as I can tell they are close enough... What's missing for you?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the devel
mailing list