bodhi 0.4.10 features
lmacken at redhat.com
Mon Jan 28 04:26:16 UTC 2008
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:50:36PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> writes:
> > Luke Macken wrote, at 01/28/2008 07:54 AM +9:00:
> >> It's actually NEXTRELEASE, instead of CURRENTRELEASE (correction sent to
> >> devel-announce). As for rationale behind this decision, I'm not quite
> >> sure, I just wrote the code :) Jon Stanley/QA/FESCo could probably shed more
> >> light on this.
> > I disagree. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=bug_status.html#status
> > says:
> Yes, this choice is surely 100% broken. I could see either
> CURRENTRELEASE or ERRATA as sane.
Agreed. Waiting to hear back from Jon as to what he meant by it; in the
mean time, I've reverted bodhi back to using CURRENTRELEASE.
Sorry for the confusion. Jon's proposal was approved at the last FESCo
meeting, but it doesn't specify what to close the bugs as. John
Poelstra's bug workflow page illustrates Jon's proposal, but specifies
that bugs be closed as RAWHIDE.
I agree with Tom that either ERRATA or CURRENTRELEASE are probably the most
sane, but we definitely need to come to a consensus, and make it official.
More information about the devel