No answer to easy bug policy

[Rahul Sundaram]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> Instead of creating a bunch of different ways to "timeout" a maintainer
> and "do something" after the fact, why can't we just fix up the
> non-responsive policy?  I'd rather have one policy than n+ for each
> situation.

This is meant to be a addition/modification of the non responsive 
maintainer's policy as noted in

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00744.html

Rahul