Calling on Fedora/RedHat ML managers to clean up Fedora-list.
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva at redhat.com
Tue Jul 29 21:09:02 UTC 2008
On Jul 28, 2008, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
> It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs
> should be included in Fedora.
+1
I wonder why nobody's complaining about all this traffic on this
non-technical thread on a list that people complained was supposed to
be restricted to technical content. Heck, why was the discussion even
started here? Double standards, as usual?
> Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during
> discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it?
Seems like that's the general feeling of those who demand silence
about it. Perhaps a separate list named "fedora-truth" or
"fedora-ethics", for this kind of discussion, would make it clear
enough that truth and ethics are not welcome on other lists.
Or maybe the support list should be named fedora-immoralist ;-P :-D
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
More information about the devel
mailing list