Packaging question: /usr/share/gnome/help ownership

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michel Salim <michel.sylvan <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> Should applications that put files under /usr/share/gnome/help be
>> required to own it (or depend on yelp)?
> 
> Own it maybe, depend on yelp definitely not, at least not in anything which 
> ends up on the KDE spin (e.g. the system-config-* tools required by Anaconda). 
> We don't want the whole xulrunner stack on the KDE spin, we don't have room for 
> it. (We use Konqueror as the browser on the KDE spin, not Firefox.)
> 
Err... the last time this came up it was successfully argued that having 
"Help" fail to work was a bug.  The initial idea was to have something 
within the GNOME stack require yelp but I believe that failed because of 
circular dependencies.

So if this will cause problems because of system-config-* dragging in 
xulrunner we need to come up with some other way of solving the 
help-won't-display bug.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080608/8bd91ac4/attachment.bin