Fedora Freedom and linux-libre

[Les Mikesell]

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
>>> To claim that there is no _legal_ basis for such a restriction is also
>>> incorrect. Nothing but the GPL gives you the right to distribute the
>>> Linux kernel. If the GPL has conditions with which you fail to comply,
>>> then you may not distribute the Linux kernel.
>>
>> I'm not sure why you'd consider being unable to distribute the Linux 
>> kernel to be a desirable thing, 
> 
> Since he said no such thing, it is pretty rude to claim that. This is 
> undesirable tactics in a argument that is being used repeatedly.

Sorry, if I misunderstood. When someone describes an alternative to 
promote their argument, I assume they are promoting the alternative as 
well.  But what did that mean if it's not what he wants?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com