Requirements gathering for new package source control

Christoph Höger choeger at cs.tu-berlin.de
Tue Jun 10 10:00:12 UTC 2008


Am Montag, den 09.06.2008, 22:44 +0000 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Christoph Höger <choeger <at> cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> > It would be a great thing, if I could control all that from my own
> > versioned repository copy with some 'make <USUAL_STEP>' commands and
> > finally merge my changes back especially when testing builds for
> > multiple releases.
> 
> Why don't you just commit the changes even if you don't know yet whether they 
> build? Especially for a small package where you're the sole maintainer, it 
> won't really matter if CVS HEAD isn't always buildable.

Well I am not alone maintaining that package and I thought that spamming
comaintainers with "hmm, let's see if _that_ works" commit mails would
not be that nice ;)

But the real reason is that I always try to make sensefull commits only
to a central repo so every revision is a complete buildable version.
This avoids others checking out and getting mad about half made work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080610/b7b84023/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list