FeaturePresto won't make beta freeze
dex.mbox at googlemail.com
Tue Mar 4 15:23:25 UTC 2008
On Mon March 3 2008 15:12:21 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> This is just a heads up to those that are interested that it doesn't
> look like we'll be able to get FeaturePresto done in time for Beta
> freeze. We haven't moved forward a whole lot from where we were six
> months ago when we realized that we were going to miss the F8 Beta
> freeze. To quickly recap what's done...
> * the yum-presto plugin works completely fine and has had no reported
> fatal (i.e. yum breaks) bugs in the last six months or so.
> * The test server has been generating deltarpms for F7 (i386, x86_64)
> and F8 (i386) for the last eight or nine months. The only problems
> we've hit here have been when the master mirror has had problems.
> Approximately 200 people are using yum-presto with F8 and have set
> their baseurl to the test server.
> ...and what's not:
> * Build-system integration. I'll be blunt. I just can't do it. It's
> not so much programming ability (though I'm definitely not at the
> buildsys guys' levels), but that I don't have the resources (time,
> ability to test on working buildsystem, etc).
> So I'm going to step back from FeaturePresto. Build-system integration
> of presto will require someone who more familiar with the system.
> Before Beta freeze, I'll push presto-utils-0.5, which will contain a
> daemon that will take xml-rpc input calls to generate deltarpms, and I'm
> also going to try to push yum-presto-0.5. I will continue to maintain
> the test server as long as my school will pay for it.
> I want to thank Jeremy, Warren, Luke and Mike for the time they've spent
> helping me with all this. If there was ever a case of pearls before
> swine, this was probably it.
Well its a real sad state of affairs that the fedora decision makers can't see
the value in reducing everyones network footprint by default. I guess its
just not sexy enuff.
More information about the devel