rawhide report: 20080307 changes

Colorado Rob colorado.rob at gmail.com
Fri Mar 7 14:47:24 UTC 2008


On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Rawhide <rawhide at fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Broken deps for x86_64
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>        boo-0.8.1.2865-2.fc9.x86_64 requires mono(NAnt.Core) = 0:
> 0.85.2478.0
>        boo-0.8.1.2865-2.fc9.x86_64 requires mono(NAnt.DotNetTasks) = 0:
> 0.85.2478.0
>        claws-mail-plugins-clamav-3.3.0-3.fc9.x86_64 requires
> libclamav.so.3()(64bit)
>        compiz-kde-0.6.2-6.fc9.x86_64 requires libkdecorations.so.1
> ()(64bit)
>        evolution-brutus-1.1.28.7-2.fc8.i386 requires libcamel-1.2.so.10
>        evolution-brutus-1.1.28.7-2.fc8.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.10
> ()(64bit)
>        flumotion-0.4.2-3.fc9.x86_64 requires pycrypto
>        gnome-web-photo-0.3-8.fc9.x86_64 requires libgkgfx.so()(64bit)
>        gnome-web-photo-0.3-8.fc9.x86_64 requires libgtkembedmoz.so
> ()(64bit)
>        gnome-web-photo-0.3-8.fc9.x86_64 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.8.1.10
>        gnome-web-photo-0.3-8.fc9.x86_64 requires libxpcom_core.so()(64bit)
>        gurlchecker-0.10.1-6.fc9.x86_64 requires libclamav.so.3()(64bit)
>        kazehakase-0.5.0-1.fc9.2.x86_64 requires gecko-libs = 0:1.8.1.10
>        klamav-0.42-1.fc9.x86_64 requires libclamav.so.3()(64bit)
>        mknbi-1.4.4-11.fc9.x86_64 requires perl(Nbi)
>        mknbi-1.4.4-11.fc9.x86_64 requires perl(Elf)
>        mknbi-1.4.4-11.fc9.x86_64 requires perl(TruncFD)
>        perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.fc9.x86_64 requires libxerces-c.so.27
> ()(64bit)
>        python-fedora-infrastructure-0.2.90.22-1.fc9.noarch requires
> python-sqlalchemy0.3
>        sugar-0.75.0-2.fc9.x86_64 requires matchbox-window-manager
>        util-vserver-build-0.30.214-2.fc8.x86_64 requires libbeecrypt.so.6
> ()(64bit)
>        vtk-examples-5.0.3-22.fc9.x86_64 requires vtkdata = 0:5.0.3
>        vtk-testing-5.0.3-22.fc9.x86_64 requires vtkdata = 0:5.0.3
>        xdvipdfmx-0.4-3.fc9.x86_64 requires dvipdfmx
>  <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>
>

Why does totem not show up as a broken dependency on this list?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080307/738dc7fc/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the devel mailing list