Last minute Nautilus change for Fedora 9
Brian Pepple
bpepple at fedoraproject.org
Sat Mar 8 21:38:44 UTC 2008
On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 22:03 +0100, Mark wrote:
> 2008/3/8, Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>:
> >
> > My opinion is that this should be decided by the the nautilus maintainer
> > or the desktop team.
>
> Are you sure?
Yeah, pretty much. I really don't think FESCo should be getting in the
practice of micro-managing packages like this. In my opinion, the
people best suited to make this decision would be our maintainers and
upstream.
Regardless though, if other FESCo members feel differently, I can always
add it to our schedule.
Later,
/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple at fedoraproject.org>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrianPepple
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080308/b6789e92/attachment-0002.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list