rawhide report: 20080307 changes

[Matt Domsch]

On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 10:38:04PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 17:45 -0600, Colorado Rob wrote:
> > That seems a bit presumptuous:
> > 
> > rpm -q totem-nautilus-xine
> > package totem-nautilus-xine is not installed
> > 
> > rpm -qa | grep totem
> > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > totem-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > totem-pl-parser-2.21.92-1.fc9.x86_64
> > totem-mozplugin-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > 
> > These are all rawhide packages.
> > 
> > rpm -q --whatrequires totem
> > totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > 
> > rpm -q --whatrequires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > no package requires totem-nautilus-2.21.93-2.fc9.x86_64
> > 
> > I'm certainly happy to entertain suggestions and delve deeper into this.
> > But let's not jump to any conclusions before all the facts are in.
> 
> Eh, I was close.  It's totem-nautilus for you.  You have it installed.
> It requires the version of totem you have installed.  However there is a
> new totem available as an update, and that new totem doesn't have a
> totem-nautilus subpackage.  So yum tries to upgrade totem, and in the
> process finds a broken dep on the installed totem-nautilus.  Since
> totem-nautilus doesn't exist in rawhide anymore, the rawhide report
> doesn't find a dep problem.

So totem needs an "Obsoletes: totem-nautilus <= lastversion-of-totem-nautilus"  

right?


-- 
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux