F9 Beta release announcement: Trying to install KDE after F9 install fails

[Joachim Backes]

seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify
>>> any yum configuration.
>> I'm afraid I can't duplicate this.  I only see x86_64 and noarch
>> packages in my install list.
>>
>> Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number.
>> If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla
>> would be best.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438966

>>
>> Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output.

<empty>

>>
>> Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software
>> Development" >yum.out 2>&1'

See attachment!
>>
> 
> Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update?

Fresh install.

JB
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: yum.out
Url: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080326/e7765d6f/attachment-0002.pl 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6101 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080326/e7765d6f/attachment-0002.bin