F9 Beta release announcement: Trying to install KDE after F9 install fails

Joachim Backes joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de
Wed Mar 26 14:36:12 UTC 2008

seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:13 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> seth vidal wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 08:48 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 12:28 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>>>> no! This was the first action after F9 install, and I did not modify
>>>>> any yum configuration.
>>>> I'm afraid I can't duplicate this.  I only see x86_64 and noarch
>>>> packages in my install list.
>>>> Couple things, first, file a bug and let this list know the bug number.
>>>> If you don't have an account, we'll continue on list, but in bugzilla
>>>> would be best.
>>>> Next, attach an rpm -qa |grep i386 output.
>>>> Next attach the yum.out file from 'yum -d9 groupinstall "KDE Software
>>>> Development" >yum.out 2>&1'
>>> Was this a fresh F9beta install or an update?
>> It was a fresh F9beta install
> According to the bug report you filed you're using yum 3.2.8 for F9Beta?
> F9beta shipped with yum 3.2.12.

I downloaded the iso yesterday afternoon immediately after the announcement :-)

Is this the wrong iso?

> you didn't install from beta.
> -sv

Joachim Backes <joachim.backes at rhrk.uni-kl.de>
University of Kaiserslautern,Computer Center [RHRK],
Systems and Operations, High Performance Computing,
D-67653 Kaiserslautern, PO Box 3049, Germany
Phone: +49-631-205-2438, FAX: +49-631-205-3056
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6088 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080326/03b342e7/attachment-0002.bin 

More information about the devel mailing list