Casey Dahlin wrote: > Why would it have to be GStreamer? Wouldn't anything > un-patent-encumbered do? (Not that this isn't un-patent-encumbered, but > in the general case). It doesn't have to be gstreamer. We have both gstreamer and xine (the free parts) in Fedora but gstreamer does make it easy to add support back for the other codecs that we don't include. Rahul