Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Callum Lerwick]

On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 11:37 +0300, George Billios wrote:
> And I thought they were for a purpose. Please name the next version of 
> Xorg in Fedora 1.4.X.Y.Z . Besides you are not an 'ignorant', you will 
> always know the real version right?

> You (and others here) miss the point, that not everybody is a developer, 
> not everybody monitors the bug list but almost everybody can notice the 
> word 'prerelease' in the F9 release notes and would like a reason why 
> this happened.

The bikeshed should be blue. You are an idiot if you don't like blue.

Also I demand a pony. It can live in the shed.

Why aren't you giving me my pony? You clearly don't care about the
community. I demand a 4000 page printed report detailing why you have
not given me my pony, delivered in person to my doorstep. I have a right
to know!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080512/af925caa/attachment-0001.bin