F9 potential service network bug?

[Dan Williams]

On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 19:32 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2008, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> 
> > NM doesn't handle all usage cases yet, which is why the legacy network
> > stack is still available for people who need it.
> 
> I'd have figured BOOTPROTO=static would not be that hard to support :P
> 
> > -jef"Rome wasn't built in a day and all that jazz"spaleta
> 
> To be honest, NM/avahi combo was not tested well enough. Even a stock
> install with selecting "static" via anaconda ended up not working.

I've personally tested static IP addressing with static DNS servers with
anaconda on the F9 release LiveCD, and it worked fine for me through
multiple tests.  What's not working for you?  Can you attach the ifcfg
files anaconda generated right after you installed?

Dan