Plan for tomorrows (20080529) FESCO meeting: FTBFS bugs

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu May 29 14:22:35 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:38 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> 
> I own some packages that don't rebuild (in F-9), I was waiting for an
> upstream release that didn't came (for libnc-dap, though there was a 
> release of libdap). I'd prefer if they were kept. I'll take the time to 
> patch them to rebuild, but I'd prefer doing it only if needed.

This is why I want to use the non-responsive maintainer policy.  If
you've responded in the bug you wouldn't be triggered as non-responsive.
We'd still have to figure out some way to get your build going, but we
wouldn't be waiting on a black hole.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080529/6c409475/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list