Software is once again unpatentable in the United States
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Sun Nov 2 20:40:47 UTC 2008
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Valent Turkovic
<valent.turkovic at gmail.com> wrote:
> Quote from http://www.pli.edu/patentcenter/blog.asp?view=plink&id=368 :
>
> Here are the highlights:
>
> * The Federal Circuit rejected the that the "useful, concrete and tangible
> result" inquiry as being inadequate.
>
> * Patentability under 101 does not depend on process steps, but rather
> requires a tangible machine or transformation into a different state.
>
> * *Software* *is* *once* *again* *unpatentable* *in* *the* *United* *States*
>
> * In order to protect what was formerly known as patentable software we
> will have to go back to claiming a machine that provides certain
> functionality.
>
> * Software patents that have been issued under the previous understanding
> of the law are almost certainly now worthless.
Wait a few months. It's likely that some involved haven't received
their cheques yet.
--
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the devel
mailing list