Comps/groups/tags-concepts [Was: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-10-29]

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le lundi 03 novembre 2008 à 13:31 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> > It means a non-comps solution won't happen short term, so in the
> > meanwhile if we want to classify things comps is the only realistic
> > place to do so (even if it's not perfect)
> 
> But what does a classification with every single package gain you?
> (Including libraries?) What's the usage case?

The use case is checking we've actually exposed all the packages we
intended to users. Even a mega "libs" ghetto group no one but the sanity
checker tools parsed would get you that.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081103/2cdc8ac9/attachment.bin