Proposal: Rolling Release

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This
>>>>> is no way intended as a criticism of a Ubuntu, but it's a realization
>>>>> that distributions like Ubuntu are able to offer a better user
>>>>> experience by using stable software on a longer support cycle.
>>>>
>>>> And this is good thing. Ubuntu has not shown themselves capable of
>>>> doing anything else but this, so let the, have that.
>>>
>>> Beg your pardon?  How many years has fedora policy forced a horribly
>>> fractured 3rd party repository situation - and not had a working java at
>>>  all while Ubuntu's approach was much more sensible?
>>
>> Fedora has a policy which they stuck to. A policy which many of us agree
>> with.
>
> Then I guess I shouldn't be surprised at your lack of concern about having a
> usable product on other fronts as well.


I have a very usable product thank you very much. And this seems
fairly offtopic for this thread.


-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )