starting Fedora Server SIG

Seth Vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Wed Nov 12 18:06:00 UTC 2008



On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Dan Horák wrote:

>
> Bill Nottingham píše v St 12. 11. 2008 v 12:08 -0500:
>> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net) said:
>>>> and it is less right, X is brought in, and also qt qt-X11. Should
>>>> certainly be investigated.
>>>
>>> That's probably because of LSB compliance. As has been discussed
>>> previously, someone needs to split the lsb package in server-side
>>> stuff and other stuff (yes that would mean a system that used only the
>>> first part would not be fully lsb compliant)
>>
>> Alternatively... make it optional? Is LSB conformance required
>> for a minimal install?
>
> IMHO LSB Core conformance should be required in minimal install
>

Why? LSB compliance should be an OPTION you can choose to have but it 
doesn't need to be there for a system work very well.

-sv


More information about the devel mailing list