a trivial fix makes a big change

[Chris Snook]

Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> You can volunteer to maintain it.
> I proposed to for a packager in FAS but I'm still waiting for the acceptance
> 
>> The RPM philosophy is that installation and configuration should be separate activities.  There
> good policy
> yes but the rpm already ships with a config file
> 
> rpm -qf /etc/samba/smb.conf
> samba-common-3.2.4-0.22.fc10.i386

Yes, and the configuration file is owned by *one* package.  When multiple 
packages try to own the same file, very bad things happen, as evidenced by this 
incident:

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/18/1210257

> so I ask for that file in that package to be modified to have a line like this
> 
> usershare path = /var/lib/samba/usershare
> 
> BTW: I forget that we have system-config-samba
> 
> we can put a checkbox [ ]  enable nautilus-share
> 

That's exactly how we should do it.

-- Chris