Broken dependencies in Fedora 9 - 2008-11-14

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 16:44 -0500, David Huff wrote:
> either way, it was my understanding that both ExclusinveArch and 
> ExcludeArch would work, ie the compose tools will check the srpm and not 
> include the package in a tree if specified in either of these feilds.

That is correct.

> Im not sure if switching form ExclusinveArch to ExcludeArch will fix the 
> issue at had.
> 
> Any comments, as I would like to run a new build to try and resolve this 
> issue.

Er, what exactly is the issue at hand?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081114/fc7c868c/attachment.bin