F11 Proposal: Stabilization

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 20:17 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Slightly different.  More like updates and updates-tested.  Something 
> you might opt-into after your machine was working the way you want and 
> you don't want to take unnecessary chances.  But it might be even better 
> to have some sort of per-package risk rating that would go down with age 
> unless problems were reported and a per-client choice of how 
> bleeding-edge to go.  And packages being pushed to fix security or 
> serious known problems could be added with a negative risk rating if the 
> packager is sure that it will make things better instead of worse.

Given that we have a hard enough time keeping things straight and
getting feedback for updates-testing, what makes you think we'll do a
better job by adding a 3rd repo into the mix?  And what are 3rd party
repos supposed to target?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081118/ce48d798/attachment.bin