RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

[Till Maas]

On Fri November 21 2008, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 20:11 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 17:10 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > > > On Fri November 21 2008, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > > > * System daemon that is a DBUS abstraction layer for package
> > > > > management (too verbose)
> > > >
> > > > I disagree that "Package management framework" would be a better
> > > > summary instead of above, because imho it is a useful information
> > > > that it is a daemon and uses DBUS.
> > >
> > > Right, framework just sounded a more complete word than daemon. Maybe
> > > "Package management service" might be a better name.
> >
> > How about "DBUS-based package management service"?
>
> Is the fact that it uses D-Bus *really* that important to an end user to
> warrant putting it in the summary?

It is the only fact I know about it that makes it special. I do not really 
know what it does, but as far as I understand it is like yum-cron, except 
that it triggers an action not periodically but via an dbus-event, e.g. when 
the yum metadata was refreshed or when the system got network access. But I 
do not really know which package is it, but this is what I experienced on 
live systems and it seems to match the description.

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081121/03a93295/attachment.bin