RFC: fix summary text for lots of packages

Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Sun Nov 23 16:59:47 UTC 2008


Le dimanche 23 novembre 2008 à 18:44 +0200, Ville Skyttä a écrit :

> > and I don't see why 
> > we should bother with FPC at all if you're taking policy in your hands.
> 
> Ahh, trolling again?  

I happen to be one of the people who waste their evenings doing package
reviews, and having to explain that a rpmlint warning packagers
religiously follow is just someone's bikeshedding added without
consultation, and sometimes even *contrary* to FPC decisions, is not fun
at all.

You can call that trolling is it makes you feel better.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081123/9bcb657a/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list