Do we care about /sbin /bin linked to /usr/lib ?
nils at redhat.com
Thu Oct 2 10:46:05 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:54 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> Chris Snook wrote:
> >> /sbin/nash uses something in /usr
> > That sounds bad.
> Why? When it's running during boot, it's on its own filesystem in ram anyway.
Given its very limited use, one could argue that the nash binary doesn't
belong into any *bin directory, but e.g. /usr/libexec or
even /usr/lib. Or does somebody use it in a running system outside
of the initrd?
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils at redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
More information about the devel