Dead or alive package [Fwd: [Bug 465111] New: FTBFS bluez-utils-3.36-2.fc10]

Jarod Wilson jarod at redhat.com
Fri Oct 10 13:58:35 UTC 2008


On Wednesday 08 October 2008 23:17:32 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > I thought it was marked dead.package, because bluez-utils was obsoleted
> > by bluez or something like that, not because of the FTBFS bug.
>
> Sure, but it's kinda pointless to fix bugs in an obsolete package. ;-)

I had the impression Bastien was asking if the package had been marked dead 
because of the FTBFS bug. I probably mis-parsed something though.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod at redhat.com




More information about the devel mailing list