reviving Fedora Legacy
jwboyer at gmail.com
Mon Oct 13 13:23:37 UTC 2008
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:17:53PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >The proposal is not to create a new distribution, but simply haev EOLed
>> >branches acl removed and leave th epossibility to build and push th
>> >eresults, with a limitation of the changes to grave bug fixes and
>> >security issues.
>> Except that conflicts with what you said above about "...use innovative
>> technologies while not being forced to update each year.".
>I wasn't clear, I should have said 'use innovative technologies during
>the time fedora is not eol', while not being forced to update each year
>(that's for the 'LTS' part).
Ah. And how is that different from CentOS? At the time CentOS 5 was
release, it also contained the latest "innovative" technologies. So,
what would be different about a Fedora LTS?
More information about the devel