rc040203 at freenet.de
Mon Oct 13 13:56:22 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 14:46 +0100, Aidan Delaney wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > No, not yet. We still haven't really worked out how to deal with the
> > incestuous dependencies between libgcc and glibc (mostly that
> > libgcc_shared.so needs to be linked against libc).
> This is further complicated as some of us (I assist with spu
> cross-complilers) use newlib rather than glibc.
I guess you are aware that most of newlib/gcc can be built one-tree-style.
More information about the devel