Regarding install options

[Jesse Keating]

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 00:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:45:47PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 22:32 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > I had a look recently, and I think that comps are in a good shape for
> > > minimal installs. (there is an issue with anaconda deps being draggued 
> > > in but it is an orthogonal issue). However chosing @core or @core +
> > > @base is an unsolved (and unsolvable, in my opinion) issue.
> > 
> > How so?  You uncheck everything to get @core, you uncheck everything but
> > the Base group to get @core + @base
> 
> It isn't what I meant, I meant it is unsolvable to tell whether minimal
> is @core or @code + @base.

Right, because "minimal" is defined in the eye of the installer, IE the
person doing the installing.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20081013/8f72fedf/attachment.bin