reviving Fedora Legacy

[Kevin Kofler]

Jesse Keating <jkeating <at> redhat.com> writes:
> It would be, if all security updates were pushed, or at least all
> critical updates.  However the current proposals are "whatever any
> maintainer feels like" not even close to "all".  Leading people into
> that realm via lazyness is in fact very irresponsible, and not something
> Fedora would put it's name on.

The assumption in the proposal is that if the update is really critical, 
somebody will care.

And those "lazy" people (in quotes because there are also other reasons than 
laziness) would otherwise end up with no updates at all, how is that better 
than at least providing _some_ security fixes, even if not all gets fixed?

        Kevin Kofler