denis at poolshark.org
Wed Oct 15 08:21:47 UTC 2008
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:12:42AM +0200, Denis Leroy wrote:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> Just a note for those not familiar with the habits from Livna/RPM
>>> Fusion: Livna/RPM Fusion normally doesn't take any packages that are
>>> suitable for Fedora (Â¹).
>> Can you define "suitable" :-) ? there are some packages that are
>> suitable in theory, but won't get in without a fight through FeSCo.
> Which free software package without patent issue wouldn't be suitable?
> Maybe an additional kernel (like the bsd kernel or the HURD, would be
> nice, any taker?), but otherwise?
- packages likely to be vetoed by a Red Hat employee (and therefore by
FeSCo): compat-python, compat-gcc-32
- packages that include kernel modules, like open-vm-tools.
More information about the devel