Fedora not "free" enough for GNU?

Alan Cox alan at redhat.com
Mon Sep 8 12:57:28 UTC 2008


On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 03:31:39AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> gnu.org does not acknowledge any license but the GPL as being "truly
> free", and they'll never acknowledge any system that is not 100.00%
> GPL code as being "truly free".  Draw your own conclusions about how
> that stance connects to reality.

Untrue. The FSF is quite happy with a lot of 'free software' licenses. There
are some (like old advertising BSD) it considers dubious. There are others it
considers free - some GPL compatible and some not. Of the ones it considers
free there are some it doesn't usually recommend first off (eg BSD) because
they don't ensure the code will remain free in future.

Alan




More information about the devel mailing list