make force-tag gone

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Tuesday 09 September 2008 08:21:30 pm Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:31:35PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> Because that's what the kernel uses and why they don't need force-tag.
> >> And even that doesn't completely eliminate the need for force-tag,
> >> because the mistake could be somewhere other than the specfile, e.g. a
> >> patch you forgot to cvs add.
> >
> >which is why I want make tag to check that all patches and sources are
> >commited to cvs before doing the tag.
>
> That's pretty hard to enforce and it should be run by FESCo before being
> implemented because it impacts the work flow of our packagers.

checking that the patches and sources referenced in the spec file are checked 
into cvs? it will not effect workflow other than making sure that everything is 
commited.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080909/39d0349c/attachment.bin