modesetting feature status

[Jesse Keating]

On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:06 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> ... we really shouldn't shove in major changes like this for a
> significant chunk of hardware post-beta.  Putting it in the beta means
> that we get a relatively large chunk of testing done due to the
> visibility surrounding the beta announce.  As well as having time to fix
> large problems that are uncovered.  Later milestones both a) lack the
> time for changes after them and b) the visibility. 

Yeah, I'm not so keen on doing all of this post-beta.  We've got enough
stability problems with F10 as it is.  This honestly feels like one of
those features that just isn't 'testable' by Beta, and thus needs to
enact the contingency plan.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KernelModesetting#Contingency_Plan

How do things look for that contingency plan.  Is it even possible at
this point?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20080911/32d0d4f5/attachment.bin