consequences when a feature gets dropped (Re: FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-09-17)

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 18.09.2008 20:04, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora <at> leemhuis.info> writes:
>> and checked during QA, but don't have a Feature page (yet)? Take for 
>> example KDE 4.1, which afaics has no Feature page (correct me if I'm 
>> wrong, I could not find one), but at least should get mentioned in the 
>> realease notes properly.
> 
> We don't consider KDE 4.1 a big enough change to deserve a full-blown feature 
> page, also considering that most of it (everything except kdepim 4 and the KDE4 
> libkipi framework in kdegraphics) also got pushed as an F9 update.
> 
> We will, however, make sure the release notes get updated for KDE 4.1 / F10, 
> this was brought up on this week's KDE SIG meeting and jreznik volunteered. 
> (I'll be helping him if needed. All the KDE release notes for F9 were written 
> by me.)

As mentioned, KDE was just an example.

Or IOW: I'm wondering what new Features we might have no FeaturePage, 
but are nevertheless worth mentioning in the release notes or should get 
testing during QA.

Cu
knurd