Independent Fedora bug tracker

[Till Maas]

On Do April 23 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> King InuYasha <ngompa13 at gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> I think this squares with my theory up-thread that it's mostly a
> >>> network issue and not the database per se.  It would be interesting to
> >>> compare the ping times the two of you see to bugzilla.redhat.com.
> >
> > [ two responses, no data ]
>
> I take it nobody wants to sully their complaining with actual facts
> that might help narrow down the problem.

Here it takes around 13-15 seconds to load a Red Hat bugzilla but report.  
Ping is 230 ms and for one bug report, Firefox creates 20 requests which all 
have to do a seperate SSL handshake, because the server does not support to 
keep connections open or HTTP Pipelining afaict. One SSL handshake seems to 
take around 700 ms currently, because there are two requests that create a 404 
and take that long. I did the measuring using the tamper data plugin btw.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090424/96b8bc55/attachment.bin