FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424
jkeating at redhat.com
Sat Apr 25 00:40:15 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe
> that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being
> installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install
> tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by
> default on the desktop live/install spins.
See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer
feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise.
If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it
was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level
if they wish.
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090424/cfb4e492/attachment.bin
More information about the devel