FESCo Meeting Summary for 20090424
Dave Airlie
airlied at redhat.com
Sat Apr 25 00:51:29 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 17:15 -0700, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > A compromise works best if both parties are on board. I don't believe
> > that the desktop guys will object to the package existing and being
> > installable if people want. No CLI needed since we have GUI install
> > tools. The objection is with the mandate for it to be installed by
> > default on the desktop live/install spins.
>
> See, the Desktop team has no say in whether or not a graphical mixer is
> available in Fedora. The middle ground between reverting the mixer
> feature all together and leaving at is it is having a graphical mixer
> installed by default available in the menus. That was the compromise.
> If the Desktop team really feels like this wasn't a compromise and it
> was something mandated and forced, they can raise it to the board level
> if they wish.
>
The mandate is for both Desktop/LiveCD spin and Fedora default install,
surely the Desktop team does decide for the desktop/livecd spin, but not
or the Fedora install. Since I'm sure the KDE spin won't want to include
either of these.
Dave.
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
More information about the devel
mailing list