2.6.29 kernel for f10

Denis Leroy denis at poolshark.org
Tue Apr 28 08:11:33 UTC 2009


On 04/28/2009 02:56 AM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> Dennis J. wrote:
>> That makes sense for a long lived distribution but not really for
>> fedora. If I really need to be running the latest versions then I'll
>> update to the next version of fedora when it comes out which is always
>> a maximum of 6 months away. I'm certain there are some fixes in the
>> new kernel that some people will appreciate and there is certainly no
>> harm in getting them but actually spending all this time on apparently
>> rather complex problems between these two kernel versions seems
>> strange if the result will be that short-lived.
>
>
> Just out of curiosity, since you aren't the one expending the effort,
> why does it bother you that someone else is?

Because of the regressions and breakage that this new kernel will 
invariably introduce. Personally, I also think this energy would be 
better spent on F-11/rawhide develompent...




More information about the devel mailing list