Updates lacking descriptions
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Thu Aug 13 08:41:26 UTC 2009
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Correct, such a step will add a significant bureaucratic burdons to
> As maintainers hate bureaucrazy and prefer investing time on dealing
> with technical issues (such as bug fixes), this will likely introduce a
> further reduction of the quality of Fedora.
> Further more, do you realise that any changelog is likely similarly
> unreadable to most users?
Nonsense, it's not bureaucracy to expect an update to actually say what
changed and why you're pushing it. I, for one, always read the descriptions.
> PS.: Stop cross-posting to newsgroups. I consider everybody who does
> this to behave rude.
We're not cross-posting, we're replying to gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel
only (using our NNTP clients). What Gmane does with it is out of our
control. Any complaints about inadequacy of the Gmane gateway will have to
go to Gmane.
More information about the devel