Confusion with openal-soft

Rahul Sundaram sundaram at fedoraproject.org
Mon Aug 17 11:01:31 UTC 2009


On 08/17/2009 03:57 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:24:38 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> 
>> On 08/17/2009 03:22 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Then you should also know that a buildroot overwrite for the other
>>> branches has been requested as well, so a simple rebuild should fix
>>> everything for those maintainers, who want to switch to openal-soft.
>>
>> The rebuild is *unnecessary*. The obsolete was added *incorrectly* for
>> the stable branches and has been fixed now. Read the bug report I
>> referenced in the original mail before replying.
> 
> You two are talking past eachother IMO. As I understand it,
> Christoph refers to anyone who wishes to (re)build with the new
> openal-soft packages, regardless of whether it must be done or not.

I know the process to do it if it was necessary to do so. It is simply
not applicable in the current situation since the obsolete was added
incorrectly.

Rahul




More information about the devel mailing list