Broken dependencies in Fedora 11 - 2009-08-20

[Juan Rodriguez]

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:20:54 -0500, Juan wrote:
>
> > I maintain beagle, and although I did add the Excludes directive to it,
> the
> > reason I haven't pushed the update is because it doesn't actually fix
> > anything other than prevent that annoying email from being sent out.
>
> Thanks for calling it "annoying". :-/  It's people like you that make me
> look forward to the autoqa team taking over the broken deps reports. Then
> I don't have to worry about people like you who don't see the value of
> the broken deps checks.


I'm sorry, I *do* value emails, as they let me know when something's wrong
(Like fail to build from source, or broken dependencies). I don't know what
I could've said instead... Repetitive?


>
> > Besides, beagle worked fine for PPC64 users on Fedora 11 at some point.
>
> Doesn't matter much. A "yum install beagle" on ppc64 doesn't work
> anymore.


Alright, I'll push the update.
Sorry for calling it 'annoying'.


>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>



-- 
Ing. Juan M. Rodriguez Moreno
Desarrollador de Sistemas Abiertos
Sitio: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20090820/2b39e5e8/attachment.html