Confusion with openal-soft

[Kevin Kofler]

Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Pushing openal-soft info F-11/F-10 is a violation of the Fedora
> updating policy.

It's not. It's entirely acceptable to bump a soname if there's a good reason 
to and dependent packages WILL have to get rebuilt. It would be impossible 
to update something like xulrunner for security fixes otherwise.

That said, in this case, IMHO there are too many dependent packages to force 
such a global rebuild.

        Kevin Kofler