[RFA] Your [PACKAGE_NAME] did not pass QA
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Dec 1 07:12:27 UTC 2009
Le lundi 30 novembre 2009 à 19:24 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > When i18n asked what was the exact need for bitmap-fonts no one
> answered.
Bitmap-fonts is an exact package name installed by default for no reason
anyone would justify
> Legibility?
>
> I don't know about font systems, is Terminuis a "core font"? It is
> bitmapped, but I don't know if that automatically makes it a "core
> font".
It does not make it automatically a "core font".
Look, people, either take my word core fonts are bad, and induce
maintenance, or make the effort to document yourself.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20091201/1dbcb59a/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list