x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)
Matthew Garrett
mjg at redhat.com
Wed Dec 16 19:16:47 UTC 2009
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 06:29:17PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
>> "It works for me" is a poor standard of support.
>
> There must be something transmogrifying my emails before it reaches
> other subscribers of this list, either that or I am being unreasonable in
> thinking that by asking /if/ Fedora would consider *supporting* this
> configuration (i.e. in the future) that it would be clear that:
> - I am not complaining about software not working quite right now
The problem here is that you appear to be massively underestimating the
amount of work that would be required to actually support this
configuration. We'd need to audit every ioctl entry point, every file in
proc and every sysfs attribute. We'd need to port every application that
uses vm86 over to using x86emu. We'd need to add, test and support a
32-to-64 bit cross building toolchain. yum would need some amount of
work that Seth has implied is significant. That's a lot of work for
marginal benefits, and nobody seems interested in stepping up to do that
work.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
More information about the devel
mailing list